“The Sandman”: Transmedia narratives as a therapy against fear
Abstract views: 180 / PDF downloads: 104
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10442759Keywords:
Cultural memory, fear, pattern-restructuring, symbol, transmedia narrativeAbstract
The article explores transmedia narratives as a space for reinterpretation of the most widespread fears of humanity. Human culture has long been using stories to pass on knowledge about potential threats while also establishing the range of potential reactions to the menace. Over time, such shared mental representations took the form of characters, events and entire plots which serve as easily recognizable symbols of fear. The present study delves into psychological mechanisms which allow individuals to process their fears through personal and cultural narratives. Individual and cultural memory is highly malleable and subject to change via a continuous meaning-making process. While recent findings in psychology and neuroscience confirm efficiency of storytelling in coping with trauma and developing a more positive attitude to the world around, semiotics of culture elaborates on similar processes at a cultural level. Though many of the common symbols are reinforced while traveling from one text to another, they are gradually adapting to the changing realities of the people using them. Transmedia narratives, in their turn, contribute to an explosive nature of this process since multiple transformations are happening simultaneously through different media. The storyworld of “The Sandman”, constructed by Neil Gaiman who published a series of comic books and co-produced a TV show based on them, is quite illustrative of such rapid change. Here, the symbolic representations of fears originating both in ancient folklore and some of the most recent events appear in quite an unexpected light. The multi-platform narrative destabilizes seemingly fixed images of Death, Desire, Sin and much more, challenging the reasons behind our fears as well as the “correct” ways of dealing with them. As the transmedia world of “The Sandman” is taken further by professionals and fans, it may be able to deconstruct our perceptions of fear and build some new ones.
References
Adami E. (2016). Multimodality. In O. Garcia et al. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Language and Society (pp. 451–472). Oxford University Press.
Adler, J., Skalina, L. & McAdams, D. P. (2008). The narrative reconstruction of psychotherapy and psychological health. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 719–734.
Bietti, L. M., Tilston O. & Bangerter A. (2018). Storytelling as adaptive collective sense-making. Topics, 11(4), 710–732. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/tops.12358.,https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/tops.12358#pane-pcw-references.
Bor, D. (2012). The Ravenous Brain: How the New Science of Consciousness Explains Our Insatiable Search for Meaning. Basic Books.
Boyd B. (2017). The evolution of stories: from mimesis to language, from fact to fiction. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1444.,https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317190091_The_evolution_of_stories_From_mimesis_to_languae_from_fact_to_fiction.
Brewin, C. R. (2001). A cognitive neuroscience account of posttraumatic stress disorder and its treatment. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39 (4), 373–393.
Bruner, J. S. (1991). The narrative construction of reality. Critical inquiry, 18, 1–21.
Clark, D. A. (2013). Cognitive restructuring. In S. G. Hoffman, D. J. A. Dozois, W. Rief, J. Smits (Eds.). The Wiley Handbook of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy. John Wiley & Sons. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9781118528563.wbcbt02.
Djikic, M., & Oatley, K. (2014). The art in fiction: From indirect communication to changes of the self. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037999.
Fauconnier, G. & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think. Basic Books.
Fischoff, S., Dimopoulos, A., Nguyen, F. & Gordon R. (2003). Favorite movie monsters and their psychological appeal. Imagin Cogn Pers, 22(4), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.2190/CJ94-83FR-7HQW-2J.
Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture. SAGE.
Gaiman, N. (1989). The Sandman. Preludes and Nocturnes. US, CA: DC Comics.
Gaiman, N. (1989-1990). The Sandman. The Doll's House. US, CA: DC Comics.
Gaiman, N. (August 19, 2022). Neil Gaiman on “The Sandman” and the Power of Dreaming [Interview]. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/podcast/the-new-yorker-radio-hour/neilgaiman-on-the sandman and-the-power-of-dreaming.
Gaiman, N. (July 30, 2022). “I can’t do superheroes, but I can do gods”: Neil Gaiman on comics, diversity and casting Death. [Interview]. Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/books/2022/jul/30/neil-gaimansandman-netflix-interview.
Hakemulder, J. (2000). The moral laboratory: Experiments examining the effects of reading literature on social perception and moral self-concept. John Benjamins Publishing.
Halberstam, J. (1995). Skin shows: gothic horror and the technology of monsters. Duke Press.
Heider, F. & Simmel, M. (1944). An experimental study of apparent behavior. The American Journal of
Psychology, 57, 243–259. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416950.
Heinberg, A., Goyer, D. S. & Gaiman, N. (Executive producers). (2022). “The Sandman”. [TV series]. PurePop Inc, DC Entertainment, Warner Bros. Television, etc.
Hodge, R. & Kress, G. (1988). Social Semiotics. Polity.
Hovious, A. S. (2016). Transmedia Storytelling: The Librarian’s Guide. Libraries United.
Jacobs, A. M. (2015). Neurocognitive poetics: Methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9. https://www.academia.edu/28487253/Neurocognitive_poetics_methods_and_models_for_investigatng_he neuronal_and_cognitive_affective_bases_of_literature_reception.
Jenkins, H. (2003). Transmedia storytelling. Moving characters from books to films to video games can make them stronger and more compelling. MIT Technology Review. http://www.technologyreview.com/news/401760/transmedia-storytelling/.
Jenkins, H. (2008). Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York University Press.
Keen, S. (2007). Empathy and the novel. Oxford University Press.
Koopman, E. M. & Hakemulder, F. (2015). Effects of literature on empathy and self- reflection: A theoretical empirical framework. Journal of Literary Theory, 9(1), 79–111. https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2015-0005.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.
Kurzweil, R. (2012). How to Create a Mind - The Secret of Human Thought Revealed. Penguin Books.
Labov, W. (2010). Narratives of personal experience. In P. Hogan (Eds.), Cambridge encyclopaedia of the language sciences (pp. 546–548). Cambridge University Press.
Lotman, Y. (2000). Universe of the Mind: A Semiotic Theory of Culture. Indiana University Press. Luhmann, N. (1984). Social Systems. Stanford UP.
Mar, R. A. & Oatley, K. (2008). The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745 6924.2008.00073.x.
Mar, R. A. (2018). Evaluating whether stories can promote social cognition: Introducing the Social Processes and Content Entrained by Narrative (SPaCEN) framework. Discourse Processes, 55(5–6), 454–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2018.1448209.
McAdams, D. P. (1985). Power, intimacy, and the life story: Personological inquiries into identity. Guilford Press.
Merrel, F. (2001). Lotman’s semiosphere, Peirce’s categories, and cultural forms of life. Sign Systems Studies. 29(2), 385–415.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2010). Not for Profit: Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Princeton University Press.
Ojamaa, M. (2015). The transmedial aspect of cultural autocommunication. Tartu University of Tartu Press.
Olick, J. K. & Robbins, J. (1998). Social Memory Studies: From ‘Collective Memory’ to the Historical
Sociology of Mnemonic Practices. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 105–140.
Parsons, T. (1977). Social Systems and the Evolution of Action Theory. Free Press.
Pennebaker, J. W. & Stone, L. D. (2003). Words of wisdom: Language use over the life span. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 291–301.
Rigney, A. (2018). Remembrance as remaking: memories of the nation revisited. Nations and Nationalism Celebrates International Women’s Day, 24(2). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nana.12388#nana12388-bib-0066.
Rutledge, P. (2011). Transmedia storytelling; Neuroscience meets ancient practices. https://www.pamelarutledge.com/transmedia-storytelling-neuroscience-meets-ancient-practices/
Rutledge, P. (2016). Everything is Story: Telling Stories and Positive Psychology. In E. M. Gregory, P.
Rutledge, Exploring Positive Psychology: The Science of Happiness and Well-Being. ABC-Clio. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343921003_Everything_is_Story_Telling_Stories_and_Positive_Pychology.
Rutledge, P. (2018). Transmedia psychology: creating compelling and immersive experiences. In M. Freeman 37 and R. R. Gambarato (Eds.), Routledge Companion to Transmedia Studies (pp. 350–363). Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351054904-39.
Scalise Sugiyama, M. (2001). Food, foragers, and folklore: The role of narrative in human subsistence. Evolution and Human Behaviour, 22 (4), 221–240. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S1090 5138(01)00063-0.
Singer, J. A. (2005). Personality and psychotherapy: treating the whole person. Guilford Press.
Smith, D., Schlaepfer, P., Major, K. et al. (2017). Cooperation and the evolution of hunter-gatherer storytelling. Nature Communications, 8, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02036-8.
Smyth, J. M., True, N., & Souto, J. (2001). Effects of writing about traumatic experiences: The necessity for narrative structuring. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 20, 161–172.
Sütiste, E. & Torop P. (2007). Processual boundaries of translation: Semiotics and translation studies. Semiotica, 163(1/4), 187–207.
Tewksbury, D. (August 10, 2022). Mason Alexander Park on Desire and the Shocking Ending of ‘The
Sandman’. Netflix. https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/the-sandman-ending-mason-alexander-park Desire.
Torop, P. (2000). Towards the semiotics of translation. Semiotica, 128(3-4), 597–609. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2000.128.3-4.597.
Wasalamudalige, H. (August 9, 2022). Why The Sandman Changed Dream's Hell-Based Duel to Include Lucifer. CBR. https://www.cbr.com/sandman-dream-hell-duel-lucifer-change-netflix/.
Wilson, T. D. (2011). Redirect: Changing the stories we live by. Little, Brown and Company.
Zylko, B. (2001). Culture and semiotics: Notes on Lotman’s conception of culture. New Literary History, 32(2), 391–408.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 TAMGA-Turkish Journal of Semiotic Studies
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.