A A study of Satish Alekar's Dynasts (2003): A Greimassian semiotic analysis of literary discourse


Abstract views: 81 / PDF downloads: 45

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10442985

Keywords:

Semiotics, Greimas, meaning, narrative, corruption, greed, power dynamics

Abstract

This study analyses Satish Alekar's narrative style in his play Dynasts by applying semiotic square analysis technique, with the following aim: to uncover the underlying meanings and symbols within the text, shedding light on Alekar's artistic choices and their impact on the overall message of the play. The aesthetic chronotope, the struggle in the plot, and the use of symbolism are examined in relation to the semiotic analysis of literary discourse in Dynasts. Furthermore, the analysis delves into the portrayal of power dynamics and the exploration of morality while highlighting how Alekar challenges societal norms and values through his characters. The story implies that deliberate consent to immoral lifestyles can lead to personal and societal downfall. This theme is further reinforced through the recurring motif of decaying relationships and corruption throughout the play. The play highlights the universal nature of greed and its impact on characters, regardless of their gender or societal roles. This exploration of human nature and societal norms provides a thought-provoking socio-political critique within the text.
Keywords: Semiotics, Greimas, Meaning, Narrative, Corruption

References

Alekar, S. (2003). Dynasts. Collected Plays of Satish Alekar. Oxford University Press.

Alekar, S. (2009, 24 January). Theatre Gupshup. Interview by Reema Gehi. [Interview]. Mumbai TheatreGuide. Retrieved from https://www.mumbaitheatreguide.com/dramas/interviews/28-satishalekarinterview.asp#.

Bandyopadhyay, S. (2009). Foreword. Collected Plays of Satish Alekar. Oxford University Press.

Bogatyrev, P. (1976). Semiotics in the Folk Theater." Semiotics of Art: Prague School Contributions, Ed. Ladislav Matejka and Irwin R. Titunik, 33-49.

Dharwadkar, A. B. (1955). Theatres of Independence. University of Iowa Press.

Eco, U. (1975). A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press.

Elam, K. (1980). The Semiotics of Theatre and Drama. Routledge.

Gill, H. S. (1996). The Semiotics of Conceptual Structures. Bahri Publications Private Limited.

Greimas, A. J. (1971). Narrative grammar: Units and levels. MLN, 86(6), 793–806.

Greimas, A. J. (1983). Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method (Daniele McDowell. Ronald Schleifer and Alan Velie, Trans.). Nebraska University Press.

Greimas, A. J. (1987). On Meaning. University of Minnesota Press.

Greimas, A. J. & Courtés, J. (1982). Semiotics and language: an analytical dictionary (Daniel Patte, James

Lee, Edward McMahon II, Gary Phillips, Michael Rengstorf Larry Crist, Trans.). Indiana University Press.

Greimas, A. J. & Fontanille, J. (1993). The Semiotics of Passions: From State of Affairs to States of Feelings. University of Minnesota Press.

Kanonge, D. M. (2009). Reading narratives in the Septuagint: A discourse on method. In J. Cook (Ed.), Septuagint and reception. Brill. (pp. 361-381).

Kanonge, D. M. (2010). The emergence of women in the LXX Apocrypha: A Semiotic Study [Unpublished PhD thesis]. North West University, Department of Greek.

Martin, B., & Ringham, F. (2000). Dictionary of semiotics. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Merriam-Webster dictionary (n. d.). Brahmin (Def. 1). Merriam-Webster dictionary. Retrieved 29 August, 2023 from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/brahmin.

Propp, V. (1968). Morphology of the Folktale. University of Texas Press.

Rajguru, S. P. (2016). Absurdity in Modern Indian Drama- Special reference to “Mahanirvan” or “The Dread Departure”. Research Directions, 4(5), 1-8.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

How to Cite

Kaur, S., & Kaur, R. (2023). A A study of Satish Alekar’s Dynasts (2003): A Greimassian semiotic analysis of literary discourse. TAMGA-Turkish Journal of Semiotic Studies, 1(2), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10442985